In re: Herbert T. Nelson

101 A.3d 434, 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 437, 2014 WL 5378347
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 23, 2014
Docket14-BG-1132
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.3d 434 (In re: Herbert T. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Herbert T. Nelson, 101 A.3d 434, 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 437, 2014 WL 5378347 (D.C. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding- petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Nelson has demonstrated that his disability has ended and he is fit to resume the practice of law and that he has been reinstated by the state of Maryland to the practice of law, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Nelson, 677 A.2d 509 (D.C.1996), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Herbert T. Nelson, Esquire, is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
2022 Ohio 3031 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.3d 434, 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 437, 2014 WL 5378347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-herbert-t-nelson-dc-2014.