In re Hepner

675 A.2d 1116, 144 N.J. 163, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 642
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 23, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 675 A.2d 1116 (In re Hepner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hepner, 675 A.2d 1116, 144 N.J. 163, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 642 (N.J. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on March 28, 1996, having filed with the Court its recommendation that JOSEPH K. HEPNER of [164]*164OCEAN CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, be restored to the practice of law,

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further recommended that prior to restoration respondent provide proof that he has completed the Skills and Methods Course offered by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education and that on reinstatement respondent practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years;

And respondent having submitted to the Court proof of his satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods Course;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the JOSEPH K. HEPNER of OCEAN CITY is hereby restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years- and until further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 A.2d 1116, 144 N.J. 163, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hepner-nj-1996.