in Re Henry

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2017
Docket14-17-00138-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Henry (in Re Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Henry, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Motion GRANTED in Part and Order filed February 27, 2017.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-17-00138-CV ____________

IN RE AMY HENRY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 306th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17-FD-0305

ORDER

On February 24, 2017, relator Amy Henry filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to order the 306th Judicial District Court, in Galveston County, Texas, to vacate the Order Granting Extraordinary Relief that the Honorable C.G. Dibrell signed on February 21, 2017, as visiting judge in trial court number 17- FD-0305.

1 Relator also filed a motions for temporary relief asking this court to stay the Order Granting Extraordinary Relief and stay the proceedings below, pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and the motions that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion in part and issue the following order:

We ORDER the following part of the Order Granting Extraordinary Relief STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court:

We do not stay the hearing on temporary orders that the trial court has set for March 2, 2017.

In addition, the court requests Mark Henry, the real party-in-interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before March 9, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

Additionally, we ORDER relator to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 by redacting the names of the children from the appendix to the mandamus petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9. If relator fails to file an appendix in compliance with this rule by March 9, 2017, this court shall strike the appendix.

2 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Henry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-henry-texapp-2017.