In re Henry S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Henry S.

33 A.D.2d 672, 305 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 672 (In re Henry S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Henry S., 33 A.D.2d 672, 305 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Family Court entered on May 7, 1968, which found appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of selling a dangerous drug, unanimously reversed on the facts and the law and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial ordered, without costs. In the circumstances of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to refuse a short adjournment. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Markewich, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Family Court entered on May 7, 1968, which found appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of selling a dangerous drug, unanimously reversed on the facts and the law and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial ordered, without costs. In the circumstances of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to refuse a short adjournment. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Markewich, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 672, 305 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-henry-s-nyappdiv-1969.