In re: Henry Miller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1120

In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3)

Submitted: February 15, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Brandon Batson Hinton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court

has unduly delayed in ruling on his writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in

the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED