In re: Henry Miller

712 F. App'x 342
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2018·No. 18-1007·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and motion for bond pending resolution of his habeas motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we' grant leavé to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Henry Miller, 712 F. App'x 342 (4th Cir. 2018).

712 F. App'x 342 (In re: Henry Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related