In re Henry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Henry

157 So. 3d 1103, 2015 La. LEXIS 12, 2015 WL 303678

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 23, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-B-2485

StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 1103 (In re Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Henry, 157 So. 3d 1103, 2015 La. LEXIS 12, 2015 WL 303678 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he published advertisements claiming to be a board certified bankruptcy specialist when, in fact, his certification had lapsed and been revoked. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Samuel 0. Henry, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he published advertisements claiming to be a board certified bankruptcy specialist when, in fact, his certification had lapsed and been revoked. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Samuel 0. Henry, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 3d 1103, 2015 La. LEXIS 12, 2015 WL 303678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-henry-la-2015.