In re Henry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Henry

157 So. 3d 1103, 2015 La. LEXIS 12, 2015 WL 303678

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 23, 2015·No. No. 2014-B-2485·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he published advertisements claiming to be a board certified bankruptcy specialist when, in fact, his certification had lapsed and been revoked. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Samuel 0. Henry, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he published advertisements claiming to be a board certified bankruptcy specialist when, in fact, his certification had lapsed and been revoked. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Samuel 0. Henry, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Henry, 157 So. 3d 1103, 2015 La. LEXIS 12, 2015 WL 303678 (La. 2015).

Pincite

157 So. 3d 1103 (In re Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.