In re Hennis

76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1050
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 15, 2016·No. No. 17-0099/AR·Published

Opinion

On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, and Petitioner’s motion to stay proceedings of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals pending petition for extraordinary writ, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied, and said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to raising the issues asserted during the course of normal appellate review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hennis, 76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1050 (Ark. 2016).

76 M.J. 45 (In re Hennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.