In re Hennis

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

In re Hennis

76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1050

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedDecember 15, 2016

DocketNo. 17-0099/AR

StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 45 (In re Hennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hennis, 76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1050 (Ark. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, and Petitioner’s motion to stay proceedings of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals pending petition for extraordinary writ, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied, and said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to raising the issues asserted during the course of normal appellate review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, and Petitioner’s motion to stay proceedings of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals pending petition for extraordinary writ, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied, and said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to raising the issues asserted during the course of normal appellate review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hennis-armfor-2016.