In re Henn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Henn

582 A.2d 808, 121 N.J. 517, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1402

DecidedDecember 10, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 582 A.2d 808 (In re Henn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Henn, 582 A.2d 808, 121 N.J. 517, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1402 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that ROBERT F. HENN of MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, be publicly reprimanded for failing to pursue a client’s interests with due diligence (in violation of RPC 1.3), for making misrepresentations to his client and failing to keep the client informed (in violation of RPC 1.4(a)), for violating the record-keeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6, and for failing to cooperate with [518]*518disciplinary authorities (in violation of RPC 8.1(b)), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT F. HENN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that ROBERT F. HENN of MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, be publicly reprimanded for failing to pursue a client’s interests with due diligence (in violation of RPC 1.3), for making misrepresentations to his client and failing to keep the client informed (in violation of RPC 1.4(a)), for violating the record-keeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6, and for failing to cooperate with [518]*518disciplinary authorities (in violation of RPC 8.1(b)), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT F. HENN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 A.2d 808, 121 N.J. 517, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-henn-nj-1990.