In re Henderson

464 S.E.2d 324, 320 S.C. 241, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 223
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 24, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 464 S.E.2d 324 (In re Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Henderson, 464 S.E.2d 324, 320 S.C. 241, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 223 (S.C. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina. He petitions to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court.

It is so ordered.

By order dated November 17, 1995, petitioner’s request to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR was granted. Petitioner now seeks to have that order vacated so he may transfer from being an active to a retired member of the South Carolina Bar.

IT IS ORDERED that this Court’s order of November 17, 1995, transferring petitioner to disability inactive status is vacated.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, A.J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 S.E.2d 324, 320 S.C. 241, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-henderson-sc-1996.