In re Henderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

In re Henderson

271 S.E.2d 9, 155 Ga. App. 417, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2606

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 7, 1980

Docket59853

StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.E.2d 9 (In re Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Henderson, 271 S.E.2d 9, 155 Ga. App. 417, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Chief Judge.

Doyle R. Henderson brings this appeal from an order of the trial court finding him in contempt of court.

1. Appellant contends that the court erred in finding him in contempt where no proof of service of the subpoena on him was shown. At the hearing the trial judge stated: “It is already agreed that he didn’t show up and that he was duly subpoenaed and duly served. That is stipulated.” As appellant’s attorney did not object to this statement there is nothing for this court to review on appeal. Ron Eason Enterprises v. McColgan, 151 Ga. App. 106 (258 SE2d 761) (1979).

2. Appellant next complains that the trial court erred in finding him in contempt as no rule nisi was shown to have been served. As this issue was not raised in the court below, it may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Grant v. State, 148 Ga. App. 867 (253 SE2d 252) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI