In re Hemby-Hutchinson Pub. Co.

105 F. 909, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedOctober 29, 1900
DocketNo. 1,471
StatusPublished

This text of 105 F. 909 (In re Hemby-Hutchinson Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hemby-Hutchinson Pub. Co., 105 F. 909, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51 (N.D. Ill. 1900).

Opinion

KOHLSAAT, District Judge.

In this case I am of the opinion that the general appearance of defendants to the rule to show cause, and their failure to set up their right to he sued in the state court until after the filing of the second amended petition herein, when for the first time a case was made upon which relief could be obtained against them, did not constitute the consent contemplated in the opinions of the supreme court covering the question of the jurisdiction in which trustees in bankruptcy may bring suit. The exceptions to the referee’s finding are therefore sustained, and the petition dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The trustee is granted leave to bring suit in the proper state court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F. 909, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hemby-hutchinson-pub-co-ilnd-1900.