In re Heisler

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Heisler

878 N.E.2d 1056, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1465

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 8, 2008

Docket2007-0401

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 878 N.E.2d 1056 (In re Heisler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Heisler, 878 N.E.2d 1056, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1465 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

On April 16, 2007, this court suspended respondent, Dwight D. Heisler, Attorney Registration No. [1466]*14660029005, last known business address in Bowling Green, Ohio, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On January 4, 2008, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent is reinstated in this matter.

It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), this reinstatement shall not terminate respondent’s current suspension in 2006-2309, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Heisler, or in any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On April 16, 2007, this court suspended respondent, Dwight D. Heisler, Attorney Registration No. [1466]*14660029005, last known business address in Bowling Green, Ohio, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On January 4, 2008, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent is reinstated in this matter.

It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), this reinstatement shall not terminate respondent’s current suspension in 2006-2309, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Heisler, or in any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

878 N.E.2d 1056, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heisler-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack