In re Heinzl

Arizona Supreme Court

In re Heinzl

818 P.2d 146, 169 Ariz. 161, 74 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18, 1991 Ariz. LEXIS 127

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1991·No. Comm. No. 89-1280·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT OF CENSURE

This matter having come on for review before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona, it having duly rendered its decision, and no timely appeal therefrom having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. JOE LAWRENCE HEINZL, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby censured and condemned for conduct unworthy of and in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed in the captioned proceedings.

2. Respondent shall pay to the State Bar of Arizona costs and expenses incurred in this matter in the sum of $4,990.54 with interest at the legal rate, within thirty days from the date hereof as provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT OF CENSURE

This matter having come on for review before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona, it having duly rendered its decision, and no timely appeal therefrom having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. JOE LAWRENCE HEINZL, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby censured and condemned for conduct unworthy of and in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed in the captioned proceedings.

2. Respondent shall pay to the State Bar of Arizona costs and expenses incurred in this matter in the sum of $4,990.54 with interest at the legal rate, within thirty days from the date hereof as provided by law.

In re Heinzl, 818 P.2d 146, 169 Ariz. 161, 74 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18, 1991 Ariz. LEXIS 127 (Ark. 1991).

Pincite

818 P.2d 146 (In re Heinzl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related