Home/Supreme Court/In re Heim

In re Heim

335 U.S. 856
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 8, 1948
DocketNo. 156
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 335 U.S. 856 (In re Heim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Heim, 335 U.S. 856 (1948).

Opinion

Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948). Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motion for leave to file should be granted and that the case should be set for argument forthwith. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Eisentrager
339 U.S. 763 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Koki Hirota v. General of the Army MacArthur Kenji Dohihara v. General of the Army MacArthur Koichi Kido v. General of the Army MacArthur
335 U.S. 876 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Hirota v. MacArthur
335 U.S. 876 (Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 U.S. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heim-scotus-1948.