In re Heffernan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Heffernan

257 A.D. 897, 12 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 897 (In re Heffernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Heffernan, 257 A.D. 897, 12 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Pulton County Special Term of the Supreme Court, fixing petitioner’s lien for disbursements and attorney’s fees at the sum of $298.53, the same to be satisfied and deducted from $600 now in the hands of the attorney, collected through his activity, on a judgment wherein appellant, a dissolved corporation, was the judgment creditor. Appellant has been represented in this matter by several attorneys. Petitioner establishes a retainer, and shows that substantial services were rendered by him, and that he obtained and now holds the fund. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. [See, also, Matter of Eisenstadt, Inc., v. Heffernan, 256 App. Div. 488; Matter of Young, ante, p. 878.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Pulton County Special Term of the Supreme Court, fixing petitioner’s lien for disbursements and attorney’s fees at the sum of $298.53, the same to be satisfied and deducted from $600 now in the hands of the attorney, collected through his activity, on a judgment wherein appellant, a dissolved corporation, was the judgment creditor. Appellant has been represented in this matter by several attorneys. Petitioner establishes a retainer, and shows that substantial services were rendered by him, and that he obtained and now holds the fund. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. [See, also, Matter of Eisenstadt, Inc., v. Heffernan, 256 App. Div. 488; Matter of Young, ante, p. 878.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 897, 12 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heffernan-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack