Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Hediger

In re Hediger

845 A.2d 1249, 179 N.J. 365, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 444
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 22, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-342, concluding that DANIEL D. HEDIGER of EDGEWATER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to commu[366] nicate with client and to comply with reasonable requests for information) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL D. HEDIGER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hediger, 845 A.2d 1249, 179 N.J. 365, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 444 (N.J. 2004).

845 A.2d 1249 (In re Hediger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.