in Re H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P.. Read the opinion of the Court — 490 S.W.3d 96
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 2015·No. 13-15-00254-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00254-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE H.E.B. GROCERY COMPANY, L.P.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Emergency Motion to Stay the Trial Court Proceedings.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Per Curiam Order

On June 3, 2015, H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P. filed a petition for writ of

mandamus and an emergency motion to stay the trial court proceedings pending

resolution of the petition. Through this original proceeding, relator contends that the trial

court abused its discretion in denying relator’s motion requesting a physical examination

of the real party in interest, Daniel Rodriguez. See generally TEX. R. CIV. P. 204.1. By

the emergency motion to stay, relator seeks to stay all trial court proceedings, including

discovery, hearings, and the current trial setting of June 15, 2015, pending resolution of

this cause. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Daniel Rodriguez, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of the business day on Tuesday,

June 9, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. Relator’s emergency motion to stay

will be carried with the case pending review of the response or further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 4th day of June, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P. (in Re H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.