in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company

DecidedApril 19, 2007

Docket14-07-00188-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company (in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00188-CV

IN RE H.E.B GROCERY COMPANY, L.P., and H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 6, 2007, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators asked this court to compel the Honorable Lynn Bradshaw-Hull, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her ruling (1) denying relators permission to have ex parte communications with plaintiff=s current or previous employers regarding plaintiff=s employment history and with plaintiff=s treating health care providers rendering care to plaintiff for the injuries made the basis of this lawsuit and (2) denying their motion to compel execution of a medical authorization that would not expire during the pendency of the lawsuit and directed to health care providers not still actively treating plaintiff.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00188-CV

IN RE H.E.B GROCERY COMPANY, L.P., and H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 6, 2007, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators asked this court to compel the Honorable Lynn Bradshaw-Hull, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her ruling (1) denying relators permission to have ex parte communications with plaintiff=s current or previous employers regarding plaintiff=s employment history and with plaintiff=s treating health care providers rendering care to plaintiff for the injuries made the basis of this lawsuit and (2) denying their motion to compel execution of a medical authorization that would not expire during the pendency of the lawsuit and directed to health care providers not still actively treating plaintiff.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re: H.E.B. Grocery Company, L.P and H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heb-grocery-company-lp-and-he-butt-grocery-c-texapp-2007.