In re Heather B.
This text of 516 A.2d 948 (In re Heather B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The maternal grandmother of three minor children appeals from the judgments of the Androscoggin Probate Court denying her petitions for the adoption of her grandchildren. The thrust of appellant’s contention is that the evidence was insufficient to justify the decision of the custodian of the children, the Department of Human Services, to withhold its consent to the adoption. Because we decide in today’s decision in In Re Melissa C., 516 A.2d 946 (Me.1986), that the Probate Court has no authority to review the action of the department and cannot approve an adoption without the consent of the custodial agency, we conclude that a review of the sufficiency of the evidence is unnecessary.
The entry is:
Judgments affirmed.
McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, WATHEN, and SCOLNIK, JJ., concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 A.2d 948, 1986 Me. LEXIS 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heather-b-me-1986.