in Re Heathe Aaron Stagg

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 2008
Docket09-08-00077-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Heathe Aaron Stagg (in Re Heathe Aaron Stagg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Heathe Aaron Stagg, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-08-077 CV



IN RE HEATHE AARON STAGG



Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Heathe Aaron Stagg filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in which he complains the trial court set an unreasonably high pre-trial bail amount. Stagg does not inform us of the offense with which he is charged, the amount of bail that is currently set, or the amount he could afford to pay to secure his pre-trial release. Stagg previously filed a pro se application for writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged that the amount of his bail was excessive, and the trial court denied Stagg's application without ruling on the merits of the application or conducting an evidentiary hearing. Stagg then filed a pro se appeal with this Court, and we dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Ex parte Stagg, No. 09-07-507 CR, 2007 WL 4214577 (Tex. App.--Beaumont Nov. 28, 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication); see also Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Noe, 646 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). Stagg also filed a pro se motion for bail reduction, which the trial court denied on October 3, 2007.

Stagg has failed to establish that the trial court failed to rule on his application for habeas corpus, his motion for bail reduction, or any other documents Stagg filed with the trial court. Therefore, relator has not demonstrated that he is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered April 24, 2008

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Ex Parte Noe
646 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Hargett
819 S.W.2d 866 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Heathe Aaron Stagg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heathe-aaron-stagg-texapp-2008.