In re Heald

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Heald

789 A.2d 973, 173 Vt. 557, 2002 Vt. LEXIS 2

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 18, 2002

DocketNo. 01-264

StatusPublished

This text of 789 A.2d 973 (In re Heald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Heald, 789 A.2d 973, 173 Vt. 557, 2002 Vt. LEXIS 2 (Vt. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent Arthur Heald appeals from the recommendation of a hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board to suspend him from the practice of law for sixty days. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have submitted a. stipulation in which respondent agrees to a public reprimand and to pay Laurence Lewin the sum of $1500 as reimbursement for legal fees and costs. In accordance with the stipulation, therefore, we reverse.

Arthur Heald is hereby publicly reprimanded, for violations of Rule 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent Arthur Heald appeals from the recommendation of a hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board to suspend him from the practice of law for sixty days. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have submitted a. stipulation in which respondent agrees to a public reprimand and to pay Laurence Lewin the sum of $1500 as reimbursement for legal fees and costs. In accordance with the stipulation, therefore, we reverse.

Arthur Heald is hereby publicly reprimanded, for violations of Rule 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 A.2d 973, 173 Vt. 557, 2002 Vt. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-heald-vt-2002.