In re Heald

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Heald

789 A.2d 973, 173 Vt. 557, 2002 Vt. LEXIS 2

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 18, 2002·No. No. 01-264·Published

Opinion

Respondent Arthur Heald appeals from the recommendation of a hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board to suspend him from the practice of law for sixty days. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have submitted a. stipulation in which respondent agrees to a public reprimand and to pay Laurence Lewin the sum of $1500 as reimbursement for legal fees and costs. In accordance with the stipulation, therefore, we reverse.

Arthur Heald is hereby publicly reprimanded, for violations of Rule 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent Arthur Heald appeals from the recommendation of a hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board to suspend him from the practice of law for sixty days. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have submitted a. stipulation in which respondent agrees to a public reprimand and to pay Laurence Lewin the sum of $1500 as reimbursement for legal fees and costs. In accordance with the stipulation, therefore, we reverse.

Arthur Heald is hereby publicly reprimanded, for violations of Rule 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.

In re Heald, 789 A.2d 973, 173 Vt. 557, 2002 Vt. LEXIS 2 (Vt. 2002).

Pincite

789 A.2d 973 (In re Heald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.