In re Hayward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hayward

58 A.D.3d 846, 870 N.Y.S.2d 921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.3d 846 (In re Hayward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hayward, 58 A.D.3d 846, 870 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the respondent for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 21, 1972, under the name Edward Joseph Hayward. By decision and order of this Court dated April 5, 2004, the respondent’s application for voluntary resignation was accepted and his name was removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in relation thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, the respondent, Edward J. Hayward, admitted as Edward Joseph Hayward, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, subject to payment of registration fees for delinquent periods, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Edward Joseph Hayward to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Spolzino and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the respondent for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 21, 1972, under the name Edward Joseph Hayward. By decision and order of this Court dated April 5, 2004, the respondent’s application for voluntary resignation was accepted and his name was removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in relation thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, the respondent, Edward J. Hayward, admitted as Edward Joseph Hayward, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, subject to payment of registration fees for delinquent periods, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Edward Joseph Hayward to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Spolzino and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.3d 846, 870 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hayward-nyappdiv-2009.