In re Haytian Corporation of America

Second Circuit

In re Haytian Corporation of America

112 F.2d 146, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 23, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 112 F.2d 146 (In re Haytian Corporation of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Haytian Corporation of America, 112 F.2d 146, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248 (2d Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order sought to be reviewed set aside an order of the referee denying applications of committees and their counsel for fees and disbursements, and referred back to the referee determination of the reasonable value of the services rendered and disbursements incurred which the debtor had agreed to pay.

The motion is denied because this court is without power to grant it, the right to appeal from such an order being governed by section 24, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47. Section 250, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650, is not applicable. That section is confined by section 101, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501, to Chapter X proceedings.

[147]*147The order sought to be reviewed is interlocutory, and if an appeal therefrom be taken under section 24, it would apparently be within the discretion of this court to dismiss it as premature. See In re Hotel. Governor Clinton Co., 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 398. But no such appeal is before us and no opinion is now expressed as to whether the court would entertain it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order sought to be reviewed set aside an order of the referee denying applications of committees and their counsel for fees and disbursements, and referred back to the referee determination of the reasonable value of the services rendered and disbursements incurred which the debtor had agreed to pay.

The motion is denied because this court is without power to grant it, the right to appeal from such an order being governed by section 24, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47. Section 250, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650, is not applicable. That section is confined by section 101, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501, to Chapter X proceedings.

[147]*147The order sought to be reviewed is interlocutory, and if an appeal therefrom be taken under section 24, it would apparently be within the discretion of this court to dismiss it as premature. See In re Hotel. Governor Clinton Co., 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 398. But no such appeal is before us and no opinion is now expressed as to whether the court would entertain it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F.2d 146, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haytian-corporation-of-america-ca2-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack