In re Haynes

D. Vermont

In re Haynes

123 F. 1001, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 264

CourtDistrict Court, D. Vermont

DecidedAugust 5, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 F. 1001 (In re Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Haynes, 123 F. 1001, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 264 (D. Vt. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEEEER, District Judge.

Upon the finding of facts reported by the referee in respect to this claim, which is for $172.05, balance due •on account for goods charged as sold, after crediting goods replevied, a rule to show cause was directed to be issued to the claimant and its agents, why the goods so charged for should not be delivered to the trustee; whereupon the claimant and its agents appeared, and for cause showed the replevin suit mentioned, brought within four months of the bankruptcy proceedings against Robert E. Gordon only, who had possession by virtue of a mortgage, whereby the goods of the bankrupt were taken and carried away from his store by the claimant. This did not constitute a preference, but was a taking by legal proceedings, made void by the bankrupt act, if valid at all against the bankrupt, and is without any showing of title by the claimant. The claimant and its agents are hereby ordered to return the goods so taken and charged for, and to deliver them» forthwith to the trustee, and the claim is thereupon allowed at $172.05, with $656.85 credited for the goods replevied, in all $828.90.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEEEER, District Judge.

Upon the finding of facts reported by the referee in respect to this claim, which is for $172.05, balance due •on account for goods charged as sold, after crediting goods replevied, a rule to show cause was directed to be issued to the claimant and its agents, why the goods so charged for should not be delivered to the trustee; whereupon the claimant and its agents appeared, and for cause showed the replevin suit mentioned, brought within four months of the bankruptcy proceedings against Robert E. Gordon only, who had possession by virtue of a mortgage, whereby the goods of the bankrupt were taken and carried away from his store by the claimant. This did not constitute a preference, but was a taking by legal proceedings, made void by the bankrupt act, if valid at all against the bankrupt, and is without any showing of title by the claimant. The claimant and its agents are hereby ordered to return the goods so taken and charged for, and to deliver them» forthwith to the trustee, and the claim is thereupon allowed at $172.05, with $656.85 credited for the goods replevied, in all $828.90.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F. 1001, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haynes-vtd-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack