In re Haynes & Sons
This text of 122 F. 560 (In re Haynes & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bankrupts having been allowed to file their petition, notwithstanding more than a year had passed since the adjudication, the only question open was whether they were entitled to a discharge, and creditors who sought to oppose it were confined to the statutory objections. It may be that the court entertained the petition after the year upon an insufficient showing, but the remedy, if so, was to move to vacate. It was too late to contest the matter on the hearing of the petition after the expense incident to it had been incurred.
Let a decree be made allowing a discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 F. 560, 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haynes-sons-pamd-1903.