In re Hayman
20 Ohio C.C. 667
This text of 20 Ohio C.C. 667 (In re Hayman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Hayman, 20 Ohio C.C. 667 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed, on the ground that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence in a case of this kind should bo clear and satisfactory, that the party was guilty of the offense charged. And it seems to us that it comes very far short of being such.
Judgment reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 Ohio C.C. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hayman-ohiocirct-1899.