In re Hayman

Hamilton Circuit Court

In re Hayman

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 815

DecidedJuly 1, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 815 (In re Hayman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hayman, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 815 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

SWING, J.

We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed, on the ground that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence in a case of this kind should be clear and satisfactory, that the party was guilty of the offense charged. And it seems to us that it comes very far short of being such.

Judgment reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWING, J.

We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed, on the ground that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence in a case of this kind should be clear and satisfactory, that the party was guilty of the offense charged. And it seems to us that it comes very far short of being such.

Judgment reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hayman-ohcircthamilton-1899.