In re Hayes

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Hayes

689 N.E.2d 547, 81 Ohio St. 3d 88

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 1998·No. No. 97-407·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record. The findings of fact, conclusions, and recommendation of the board have ample support, and we hereby adopt them. Applicant is unfit to practice law, and his application to register as a candidate for admission to the bar of Ohio is disapproved. Applicant is never to be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment' accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record. The findings of fact, conclusions, and recommendation of the board have ample support, and we hereby adopt them. Applicant is unfit to practice law, and his application to register as a candidate for admission to the bar of Ohio is disapproved. Applicant is never to be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment' accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

In re Hayes, 689 N.E.2d 547, 81 Ohio St. 3d 88 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

689 N.E.2d 547 (In re Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related