In re Hayes

404 S.E.2d 272, 261 Ga. 10, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 138
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1991
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 745
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 404 S.E.2d 272 (In re Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hayes, 404 S.E.2d 272, 261 Ga. 10, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 138 (Ga. 1991).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is a petition for reinstatement to membership in the State Bar of Georgia.

Applicant, Moses S. Hayes, Jr., was admitted to practice law in Georgia in November 1972. Early in 1984, in response to a voluntary petition for discipline, he was disbarred by an Order dated April 18, 1984.

Applicant having met the requirements of Rule 4-301 (c) (1), a Special Master was appointed. After a thorough investigation and a hearing in the matter, the Special Master found: That applicant has met his burden by showing clear and convincing proof of rehabilitation and of his fitness to be reinstated as a member of the State Bar of Georgia. The Special Master recommended that applicant’s Petition for Reinstatement be granted.

[11]*11Decided March 15, 1991. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. John A. Chandler, for Hayes.

The Review Panel adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Special Master as that of the Review Panel and recommends that applicant Moses S. Hayes, Jr.’s petition for reinstatement be granted subject to the provisions of State Bar Rule 4-305.

The recommendation of the Review Panel is hereby accepted by this Court. It is therefore ordered that petitioner may be reinstated as a member of the State Bar of Georgia upon his complete compliance with all of the requirements for reinstatement as imposed by the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoglen v. the State
784 S.E.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
404 S.E.2d 272, 261 Ga. 10, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hayes-ga-1991.