In re Hayes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

In re Hayes

11 F. Cas. 908, 29 Int. Rev. Rec. 46

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

DecidedJanuary 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. Cas. 908 (In re Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hayes, 11 F. Cas. 908, 29 Int. Rev. Rec. 46 (circtdma 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, District Júdge,

in delivering the opinion of the court, said that “other persons,” in section 1419 [Rév. St U. S.], meant persons capable of making such a contract, and that McNulty’s Case [Case No. 8,917] was conclusive on him on this, and he declined to follow Collins’ Case, 25 How. Pr. 157, in which the enlistment under the precise facts of the case before him was held valid. The minor was ordered to be discharged upon refunding to the United States the amount of the advance made upon enlistment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, District Júdge,

in delivering the opinion of the court, said that “other persons,” in section 1419 [Rév. St U. S.], meant persons capable of making such a contract, and that McNulty’s Case [Case No. 8,917] was conclusive on him on this, and he declined to follow Collins’ Case, 25 How. Pr. 157, in which the enlistment under the precise facts of the case before him was held valid. The minor was ordered to be discharged upon refunding to the United States the amount of the advance made upon enlistment

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 908, 29 Int. Rev. Rec. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hayes-circtdma-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack