In re Hayes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

In re Hayes

11 F. Cas. 908, 29 Int. Rev. Rec. 46

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided January 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

NELSON, District Júdge,

in delivering the opinion of the court, said that “other persons,” in section 1419 [Rév. St U. S.], meant persons capable of making such a contract, and that McNulty’s Case [Case No. 8,917] was conclusive on him on this, and he declined to follow Collins’ Case, 25 How. Pr. 157, in which the enlistment under the precise facts of the case before him was held valid. The minor was ordered to be discharged upon refunding to the United States the amount of the advance made upon enlistment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, District Júdge,

in delivering the opinion of the court, said that “other persons,” in section 1419 [Rév. St U. S.], meant persons capable of making such a contract, and that McNulty’s Case [Case No. 8,917] was conclusive on him on this, and he declined to follow Collins’ Case, 25 How. Pr. 157, in which the enlistment under the precise facts of the case before him was held valid. The minor was ordered to be discharged upon refunding to the United States the amount of the advance made upon enlistment

In re Hayes, 11 F. Cas. 908, 29 Int. Rev. Rec. 46 (circtdma 1883).

Pincite

11 F. Cas. 908 (In re Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related