In re Hawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hawley

30 A.D.2d 1002, 294 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 1002 (In re Hawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hawley, 30 A.D.2d 1002, 294 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 10, 1967, assessing additional contributions for the period from October 1, 1960 through December 31, 1965. The issue presented is whether or not the alleged employee was an independent contractor rather than an employee. The board found that the employer exercised supervision, direction and control over the employee’s activities, and that she was an employee throughout the period in issue. The board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence which established that the employer instructed the employee, a photographer, in the proper method of taking pictures; helped the employee with technical problems; provided the materials necessary to carry on the work; received weekly reports from the employee on every picture taken; and determined whether or not the photographs met the quality and standard of the employer. The question of the existence of an employment relationship is factual and, where such a finding is supported by the evidence, it must be accepted as final and conclusive. (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Electrolux Corp. [Miller], 288 N. Y. 440; Matter of Kelly [Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 786.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 10, 1967, assessing additional contributions for the period from October 1, 1960 through December 31, 1965. The issue presented is whether or not the alleged employee was an independent contractor rather than an employee. The board found that the employer exercised supervision, direction and control over the employee’s activities, and that she was an employee throughout the period in issue. The board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence which established that the employer instructed the employee, a photographer, in the proper method of taking pictures; helped the employee with technical problems; provided the materials necessary to carry on the work; received weekly reports from the employee on every picture taken; and determined whether or not the photographs met the quality and standard of the employer. The question of the existence of an employment relationship is factual and, where such a finding is supported by the evidence, it must be accepted as final and conclusive. (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Electrolux Corp. [Miller], 288 N. Y. 440; Matter of Kelly [Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 786.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 1002, 294 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hawley-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack