In re Hawkins

685 A.2d 753, 1996 WL 682219
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 1996·No. No. 95-BG-1387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the court on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility to disbar respondent following his conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. Respondent was convicted in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, of possession for sale of a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11351. We have held that the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute involves moral turpitude per se. See In re Mendes, 598 A.2d 168, 169 (D.C.1991); In re Campbell, 572 A.2d 1059, 1061 (D.C.1990). The crimes of conviction in those decisions are indistinguishable from the crime for which respondent was convicted. Accordingly, respondent must be disbarred. D.C.Code § 11-2503(a) (1995); In re Colson, 412 A.2d 1160 (D.C.1979) (en banc).

We therefore order respondent disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia effective immediately. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(f) (1996).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hawkins, 685 A.2d 753, 1996 WL 682219 (D.C. 1996).

685 A.2d 753 (In re Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Mendes
598 A.2d 168 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Matter of Campbell
572 A.2d 1059 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Matter of Colson
412 A.2d 1160 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)