In re Hausmann

458 F.2d 1385, 59 C.C.P.A. 1046, 173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 691, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 328
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedMay 18, 1972
DocketNo. 8757
StatusPublished

This text of 458 F.2d 1385 (In re Hausmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hausmann, 458 F.2d 1385, 59 C.C.P.A. 1046, 173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 691, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 328 (ccpa 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner’s rejection of all of the claims in appellant’s application1 under 35 USC 103 over certain references.2 The claimed subject matter is garden shears and the alleged novelty is the location of a “hang up hole” in a certain part of one or both of the blades. The prior art discloses shears with cutting blades provided with one or more holes which could be used to hang up the shears.

After a thorough consideration of the references, the rejection, and appellant’s arguments, we are of the opinion that the board has not committed any error. Accordingly, the decision of the board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 F.2d 1385, 59 C.C.P.A. 1046, 173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 691, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hausmann-ccpa-1972.