In re Hausman

Second Circuit

In re Hausman

121 F. 984, 58 C.C.A. 260, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 12, 1903·No. No. 135·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In affirming the order of the court below, we do not consider the question whether the bankrupt should be punished for contempt in the event of failing to comply with the order, as that question, although the one principally argued, is not here. If it should be sought to punish him for contempt, the court below will doubtless give him an opportunity to prove his inability to comply with the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In affirming the order of the court below, we do not consider the question whether the bankrupt should be punished for contempt in the event of failing to comply with the order, as that question, although the one principally argued, is not here. If it should be sought to punish him for contempt, the court below will doubtless give him an opportunity to prove his inability to comply with the order.

In re Hausman, 121 F. 984, 58 C.C.A. 260, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706 (2d Cir. 1903).

Pincite

121 F. 984 (In re Hausman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related