In re Hatton

596 N.E.2d 1037, 64 Ohio St. 3d 440, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1836
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 26, 1992·No. No. 92-261·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding that Robert Timothy Hatton has not shown the good character required for admission to the Ohio Bar. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, Hatton’s application is disapproved, and he is barred from reapplying for admission to the practice of law in this state.

Order accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hatton, 596 N.E.2d 1037, 64 Ohio St. 3d 440, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1836 (Ohio 1992).

596 N.E.2d 1037 (In re Hatton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related