In re Hatten

22 Abb. N. Cas. 66
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided January 15, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.,

directed that the record be returned to the surrogate, which was accordingly done.

Ransom, Surr., thereupon admitted the will to probate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hatten, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

22 Abb. N. Cas. 66 (In re Hatten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Budlong
7 N.Y.S. 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)