In re Hatch

41 N.Y.S. 1118, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1488

This text of 41 N.Y.S. 1118 (In re Hatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hatch, 41 N.Y.S. 1118, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

No opinion. The applicant’s papers are defective, in that they fail to show that the applicant has practiced three years before the highest court of law in the state of Michigan, as required by rule 2, relating to the admission of attorneys. This proof mav be supplied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.Y.S. 1118, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hatch-nyappdiv-1896.