In Re Hatch
This text of 993 So. 2d 215 (In Re Hatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Christopher D. HATCH.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Christopher D. Hatch, is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of five years. The probationary period may be extended upon recommendation of the Executive Director of the Lawyers Assistance Program. During the probationary period, petitioner shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the contract executed by him with the Lawyers Assistance Program, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Executive Director of the Lawyers Assistance Program. Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.
CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 So. 2d 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hatch-la-2008.