In re Hason C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hason C.

228 A.D.2d 675, 646 N.Y.2d 19, 646 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 675 (In re Hason C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hason C., 228 A.D.2d 675, 646 N.Y.2d 19, 646 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[676]*676Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the petitioner (cf., People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant contends that the petitioner failed to disprove the defense that his possession of the gun was merely temporary and innocent (cf., People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 130). As this case was tried before a court without a jury, the greatest respect must be accorded the determination of the trial court in assessing the credibility of witnesses and resolving disputed questions of fact. The determination of the Family Court is accorded the same weight as that given a jury verdict (see, Matter of Wilson G., 214 AD2d 670; Matter of Jamal V., 159 AD2d 507). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the finding of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (cf., CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[676]*676Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the petitioner (cf., People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant contends that the petitioner failed to disprove the defense that his possession of the gun was merely temporary and innocent (cf., People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 130). As this case was tried before a court without a jury, the greatest respect must be accorded the determination of the trial court in assessing the credibility of witnesses and resolving disputed questions of fact. The determination of the Family Court is accorded the same weight as that given a jury verdict (see, Matter of Wilson G., 214 AD2d 670; Matter of Jamal V., 159 AD2d 507). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the finding of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (cf., CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 675, 646 N.Y.2d 19, 646 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hason-c-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack