In re Hasbrouck
This text of 195 A.3d 125 (In re Hasbrouck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB
*12617-349, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent) that Seth C. Hasbrouck of Woodbury, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2009, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client); RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that Seth C. Hasbrouck is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.3d 125, 235 N.J. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hasbrouck-nj-2018.