In re Hartwyk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Hartwyk

171 A.3d 205, 231 N.J. 21

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 20, 2017

DocketD–123 Sept. Term 2016; 079187

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.3d 205 (In re Hartwyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hartwyk, 171 A.3d 205, 231 N.J. 21 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB

*20616-266, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HARTWYK of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act reflecting adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HARTWYK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further **22ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB

*20616-266, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HARTWYK of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act reflecting adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HARTWYK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further **22ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.3d 205, 231 N.J. 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hartwyk-nj-2017.