In re Hartmann
This text of 632 A.2d 526 (In re Hartmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
ROBERT K. HARTMANN of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1949, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from the practice of law by this Court on September 18,1992, and who remains suspended at this time, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that ROBERT K. HARTMANN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further
ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ROBERT K. HART-MANN, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 A.2d 526, 134 N.J. 214, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hartmann-nj-1993.