In re Hartman
367 A.2d 175, 134 Vt. 625, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 872
Opinion
The judgment of the Washington Superior Court is affirmed, upon the grounds that the procedures in trial court now complained of were assented to by the respondent and were not in conformity to applicable law, he not then being in execution. 13 V.S.A. § 7031(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hartman, 367 A.2d 175, 134 Vt. 625, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 872 (Vt. 1976).
367 A.2d 175 (In re Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 7031
Vermont § 7031(b)