Home/Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania/In re Hartman

In re Hartman

873 A.2d 883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Hartman. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Pa. Jud. Disc. LEXIS 5 →
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania·Decided May 18, 2005·No. No. 5 JD 04·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2005, after hearing held this day on the issue of sanctions and upon consideration of statements by counsel for the Respondent and by the Respondent himself, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent is reprimanded.

SPRAGUE, J., did not participate in the consideration or disposition of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hartman, 873 A.2d 883 (cjdpa 2005).

873 A.2d 883 (In re Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.