In re Hartford Street

Ohio Circuit Courts

In re Hartford Street

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123

DecidedJanuary 25, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123 (In re Hartford Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hartford Street, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

WINCH, J.

In this ease we hold that a proceeding brought under favor of Secs. 2655 to 2657 (Lan. 3940 to 3942; B. 1536-148 to 1536-150) Rev. Stat., for the vacation of a street is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a, civil action, and so is not appealable to the circuit court under Sec. 5226 Rev. Stat.

So holding, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Marvin and Metcalf, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

In this ease we hold that a proceeding brought under favor of Secs. 2655 to 2657 (Lan. 3940 to 3942; B. 1536-148 to 1536-150) Rev. Stat., for the vacation of a street is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a, civil action, and so is not appealable to the circuit court under Sec. 5226 Rev. Stat.

So holding, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Marvin and Metcalf, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hartford-street-ohiocirct-1909.