In re Hartford Street

Ohio Circuit Courts

In re Hartford Street

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123

Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided January 25, 1909·Published

Opinion

WINCH, J.

In this ease we hold that a proceeding brought under favor of Secs. 2655 to 2657 (Lan. 3940 to 3942; B. 1536-148 to 1536-150) Rev. Stat., for the vacation of a street is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a, civil action, and so is not appealable to the circuit court under Sec. 5226 Rev. Stat.

So holding, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Marvin and Metcalf, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

In this ease we hold that a proceeding brought under favor of Secs. 2655 to 2657 (Lan. 3940 to 3942; B. 1536-148 to 1536-150) Rev. Stat., for the vacation of a street is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a, civil action, and so is not appealable to the circuit court under Sec. 5226 Rev. Stat.

So holding, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Marvin and Metcalf, JJ., concur.

In re Hartford Street, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 123 (In re Hartford Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.