in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
This text of in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Appellate case number: 01-22-00926-CV Trial court case number: 37665 Trial court: 335th District Court of Washington County On December 14, 2022, relator, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s October 14, 2022 order granting real party in interest, Tommy Dale Privett’s, motion to compel the deposition of a corporate representative of relator. Relator alleges that the trial court abused its discretion by compelling relator to present a corporate representative for deposition when the deposition is not proportional to the needs of the case, and requests that the Court grant a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to “vacate the order compelling the corporate-representative deposition.” The Court requests a response to the petition for a writ of mandamus from real party in interest. The response(s), if any, is due no later than twenty days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Amparo Guerra_______ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __December 20, 2022_____
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hartford-casualty-insurance-company-texapp-2022.