in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 28, 2011·No. 01-11-00290-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 28, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00290-CV

———————————

In re Hartford Casualty insurance company, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Relator, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s order denying relator’s motion to compel appraisal and motion to stay proceedings pending appraisal.  While relator’s petition was pending, the underlying case was dismissed with prejudice because the parties reached a settlement.[1]  Relator informed the Court that it no longer seeks mandamus relief.   

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.



[1]           The underlying case is Sparkle Corp., Sparkle Sign Co., Inc., J&M Leasing Inc., and Behzad Industries of Texas, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Cody Randall Hartman, No. 2009-52200, in the 189th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable William R. Burke presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (in Re Hartford Casualty Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.