In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc.

W.D. Texas

In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc.

130 B.R. 930, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1138, 1991 WL 156954

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas

DecidedAugust 5, 1991

DocketBankruptcy No. 87-30284-C

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 130 B.R. 930 (In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc., 130 B.R. 930, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1138, 1991 WL 156954 (Tex. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION OF DEBTOR TO ASSUME EXECUTORY CONTRACT WITH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

CAME ON for further consideration the foregoing cause, in which movant debtor sought to assume an executory contract with the United States of America. This court entered an interlocutory order finding that the debtor was not prohibited as a matter of law from assuming an executory contract with the United States of America. See In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc., 117 Bankr. 865 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1990). The parties appealed the matter to the district court. Thereafter, the matter was settled. Part of the agreement was that the orders and judgments of this court from which appeal were taken be vacated and set aside. By order dated July 30, 1991, 130 B.R. 929 the district court vacated the interlocutory order from which appeal was taken, and directed the dismissal of the motion. Pursuant to the direction of the district court, the motion of the debtor to assume exec-utory contract with the United States is DISMISSED.

So ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION OF DEBTOR TO ASSUME EXECUTORY CONTRACT WITH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

CAME ON for further consideration the foregoing cause, in which movant debtor sought to assume an executory contract with the United States of America. This court entered an interlocutory order finding that the debtor was not prohibited as a matter of law from assuming an executory contract with the United States of America. See In re Hartec Enterprises, Inc., 117 Bankr. 865 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1990). The parties appealed the matter to the district court. Thereafter, the matter was settled. Part of the agreement was that the orders and judgments of this court from which appeal were taken be vacated and set aside. By order dated July 30, 1991, 130 B.R. 929 the district court vacated the interlocutory order from which appeal was taken, and directed the dismissal of the motion. Pursuant to the direction of the district court, the motion of the debtor to assume exec-utory contract with the United States is DISMISSED.

So ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 B.R. 930, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1138, 1991 WL 156954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hartec-enterprises-inc-txwb-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack