in Re: Harrop Construction Company, Inc. and Bert Harrop
This text of in Re: Harrop Construction Company, Inc. and Bert Harrop (in Re: Harrop Construction Company, Inc. and Bert Harrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 5, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01399-CV
IN RE HARROP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., AND BERT HARROP , Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 23, 2003, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. They seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to review interim discovery orders made by arbitrators while the case is pending arbitration.
Realtors have not fully complied with Tex. R. App. P. 52, not have they shown themselves entitled to mandamus relief. We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 5, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Harrop Construction Company, Inc. and Bert Harrop, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harrop-construction-company-inc-and-bert-har-texapp-2004.